Skip to main content

Tarkovsky Poems


This article reminded me of my own poem inspired by Tarkovsky's 'The Mirror'.  One of the greatest and saddest films of all time.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/booksblog/2013/mar/04/poem-week-the-snow-whirls-tua-forsstrom

Comments

The Midnight Mollusc said…
My name is David Spittle - I sent you a message about my thesis on Ashbery a while ago. Just wanted to say thanks - for this link, for bringing this collection into my sphere of poetic procrastination. I remember seeing 'The Mirror' a couple of years ago...and I felt similarly haunted by some of the images - the woman levitating - the cabin and fire at the start...Mr Tarkovsky is quite something (to offer a grotesque understatement). Saw 'Stalker' at a local cinema last year...whole new level of glacial genius! really enjoyed reading your meditative, post Mirror immersion -'The Minutes'.
14 March 2013 at 20:33
Watkin said…
Thanks David of course I remember you I was supposed to send you my experimental novel which I never did of course for which you should thank me! I like your blog by the way, I also love Mother and Son. One of my wife's top 5 falling asleep to films, The Mirror is another.

By the way I am updating my Ashbery material on the blog. Take a look some time I started today with re-annotating "Two Scenes".
18 April 2013 at 14:49
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Deleuze, Difference and Repetition

For a long time I have felt that poetics has not taken into consideration a great deal written about issues pertaining to difference and repetition to be found in contemporary philosophy. As poetry's whole energy and dynamic is based on a fundamental relation to differential versus repeated units of sense (sense both in terms of meaning and the sensible), any work on difference and repetition would be welcome. That some of the greatest thinkers of the age, notably Deleuze and Derrida, have made both issues core to their whole philosophical systems is so remarkable that poetics is impoverished if it does not fully acknowledge this. Not that I am one to talk. Although I am aware of the centrality of Deleuze's work to postmodern poetry, I have as yet not been able to really address this but in Poetry Machines I began that work at least. In preparation for the few hundred words I wrote there, here are the 10,000 words I annotated in preparation. Deleuze, Gilles. Difference an...
Post a Comment
Read more

Frank O'Hara, Collected Poems pp.201-300 Annotated

Frank O’Hara, Collected Poems (Berkeley, Cal.: University of California Press, 1995) Pages 201-300 Close Readings and annotations of every poem in the collection September 1997 in preparation for In the Process of Poetry: The New York School and the Avant-Garde (Bucknell UP, 2001) Frank O’Hara “In the Movies”, 206-209 · interesting that this poem has not been picked up by the critics for it is an easy point to indicate the importance of films in O'Hara’s aesthetic indicating the dissolves, cuts and montage effects he has been credited with and whilst I do not like to appropriate analogous terms in this fashion the montage of O'Hara is easily distinguishable form the collage of Ashbery in that here it is the movement from image to image in an attempt at seamlessness, a basic synaesthesia of subject in the now of consciousness. · in addition to the basic aesthetic implications of this use of films there are also certain other issues that he raises here but does not rea...
1 comment
Read more

Frank O'Hara, Collected Poems pp.1-100 Annotated

Frank O’Hara, Collected Poems (Berkeley, Cal.: University of California Press, 1995) Pages 1-100 Close Readings and annotations of every poem in the collection September 1997 in preparation for In the Process of Poetry: The New York School and the Avant-Garde (Bucknell UP, 2001) Frank O’Hara “How Roses get Black”, 3 • the poem seems to contain at least two anti-heroes, the violent “you”, bent on destruction of ornamentation against the modernity of the radiator, burning symbolist roses who also has some biblical precedence with reference to the burning bushes. Then the “I” who is the narrator and thus able to transform the “you” from Moses to John the Baptist by asking for the leonine head of the “you”. This “I” owns and creates the “you”, defining his heroism in the act of destruction which refers of course to the “you’s” act of destroying the roses in the first three stanzas. The line “Heros alone destroy, as I destroy” is straight out of “In Mem...” • what is of issue here is the d...
Post a Comment
Read more