Skip to main content

John Ashbery's Daffy Duck in Hollywood (1)

An introduction and guide to reading John Ashbery Daffy Duck in Hollywood

Outwork
This is the most complete guide to reading John Ashbery's "Daffy Duck in Hollywood." It relies on all the available scholarship to date. At the same time it is a first attempt at establishing this work as the archetypal postmodern poem. As such it is a detailed introduction to postmodern poetry. It alos compares an archetypal postmodern poem with and archetypal modernist poem, Eliot's The Waste Land to show differences between modernism and postmodernism.

Introduction:
Some of the finest Donald Duck t-shirt in our time has been written in poetry.[i]


Is it possible to choose a favourite or, Enlightenment style, define the very best based on assumed, communally held conceptions of value? People around me are always asking what I am working on and when I tell them postmodern poetry they say oh, what’s that then, and I pause to reflect, often for a very long time indeed. I think, wouldn’t it be great if I could carry postmodern poetry around in my wallet so that in answer to the question what is postmodern poetry, I could simply open that wallet, point to an artefact inside and say look, there it is! Of course one cannot do that. Postmodernism in general is against exemplarity and canonicity, and so am I, it responds to ontological questions of being by refusing the foundations upon which such questions are based,[ii] it also emphasises process over product so that halting the stream and pointing to one rivulet or rock within it simply does not make sense. One cannot choose an exemplary postmodern artefact in good conscience, therefore, but if one could, in bad conscience, do that, feeling terrible about it but doing it anyway, then the artefact in question for me would be the poem “Daffy Duck in Hollywood” by American poet John Ashbery.[iii]

I have taken a sentence from Ron Silliman’s long prose poem Tjanting to back me up on this, a statement that can be taken in at least one of two ways. One might read it literally as the syntax suggests and say that the commodification represented by Donald Duck t-shirts has spread to such a degree in our culture that contemporary poetry as product cannot be said to be any different. That is the negative reading. The more positive reading is to try to reconstitute the grammatical order of the words, which seemed to have suffered a good old-fashioned poetic inversion, and read the sentence as meaning some of the best poetry of our age has been written in (on) things like Donald Duck t-shirts, bumper stickers and the like. This is not only in the spirit of Tjanting, which often celebrates the everyday detail of postmodern culture and uses such grammatical inversions, but also suggests that the postmodern poem can be both critical and admiring of postmodern consumer capitalism. I am sure Silliman didn’t quite have this in mind, but this is what Ashbery’s “Daffy Duck in Hollywood” is primarily about.

Notes:
[i] Ron Silliman, Tjanting (Cambridge: Salt, 2002) 104.
[ii] In particular I am thinking of Derrida’s reponse to the question “What is poetry” at the beginning of his long essay on the work of Mallarmé…
[iii] John Ashbery Bio

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Deleuze, Difference and Repetition

For a long time I have felt that poetics has not taken into consideration a great deal written about issues pertaining to difference and repetition to be found in contemporary philosophy. As poetry's whole energy and dynamic is based on a fundamental relation to differential versus repeated units of sense (sense both in terms of meaning and the sensible), any work on difference and repetition would be welcome. That some of the greatest thinkers of the age, notably Deleuze and Derrida, have made both issues core to their whole philosophical systems is so remarkable that poetics is impoverished if it does not fully acknowledge this. Not that I am one to talk. Although I am aware of the centrality of Deleuze's work to postmodern poetry, I have as yet not been able to really address this but in Poetry Machines I began that work at least. In preparation for the few hundred words I wrote there, here are the 10,000 words I annotated in preparation. Deleuze, Gilles. Difference an...

Postmodern Poetry (2)

Postmodern Poetry, A Definition Postmodern poetry is an international phenomena of aesthetic multiplicities as is typical of many postmodern cultural products. It also operates self-consciously, even foundationally, within a philosophical and/or ideological context where categorisation and closed definition are rejected in favour of investigation and free play. A definition, therefore, can only ever be of a general nature and it must always be accepted that such a definition is closer to a strategy or better, as it is poetry of which we speak, a pattern into which the rangy, tireless energy of the poetry has settled for an unspecified but limited period of time. I could, at this point, pass the buck entirely and suggest that postmodern poetry exceeds definition but this would not be true for it operates within an environment still constituted by modernist values of summation and fixity for which definitions are essential. If I do not impose a definition some other agency will perha...

Frank O'Hara, Collected Poems pp.201-300 Annotated

Frank O’Hara, Collected Poems (Berkeley, Cal.: University of California Press, 1995) Pages 201-300 Close Readings and annotations of every poem in the collection September 1997 in preparation for In the Process of Poetry: The New York School and the Avant-Garde (Bucknell UP, 2001) Frank O’Hara “In the Movies”, 206-209 · interesting that this poem has not been picked up by the critics for it is an easy point to indicate the importance of films in O'Hara’s aesthetic indicating the dissolves, cuts and montage effects he has been credited with and whilst I do not like to appropriate analogous terms in this fashion the montage of O'Hara is easily distinguishable form the collage of Ashbery in that here it is the movement from image to image in an attempt at seamlessness, a basic synaesthesia of subject in the now of consciousness. · in addition to the basic aesthetic implications of this use of films there are also certain other issues that he raises here but does not rea...