Skip to main content


Line Measure: Historical Precedents
Up until the twentieth century, with some notable exceptions, the dominant unit of measure and rhythm in poetry was the syllable. This is not so say that other elements of the poem could not also take measure or produce rhythm, but that syllabic effects were foregrounded to such a degree that the visual field of the poem or the distribution of the lexicon, to give two examples of areas that can have definite rhythmical patterns, tended not to be seen or heard.

Syllabic measure relegates the line to a container of syllables so that once the poet has determined, say, to go with four stressed syllables the line must exist merely to accommodate this, probably in a tetrameter of some sort and the patterning of the lines themselves exists merely as an accidental by-product of this. Similarly, stanzaic patterns, which can be visually arresting such as in Keats' odes or Byron's terza rima, dictate the number and distribution of the lines so that any rhythmical effects are either accidental or, to a degree, just icing on the syllabic cake. While these lines can have a visual rhythm to them, and they are fundamental to the metrical patterning of the poem, they are not, on the whole, a direct decision on the part of the poet to produce an effect. Then came Wordsworth, Whitman, and Mallarmé...

Wordsworth's lineation in his conversation poems and The prelude remind me somewhat of the late works of Turner or Monet. They didn't intend to fall into abstraction they just pushed the limits of representation to a point where abstraction occurred. In the same way I am sure Wordsworth did not want to destroy blank verse but the extremities of his run-on lines, over-leaping the semantic purpose of the line-break, indeed of iambic pentametre in general, so as to fit his ideas into the poem field mean that blank verse comes to look pointless. His subject matter, the soul or effects of memory, is larger than one or two lines and too diffuse to fit neatly into units of 10, 20, 30 and so on.

Whitman, of course, chose as his subject matter in Leaves of Grass a vast nation and the sheer breadth of his lines reflect this. Heis, as far as I am aware, the first English language poet to abandon syllabic measure in favour of line-measure. America is big, democracy is big, the human spirit is big, the breath of the seer is big, and therefore the poem line must be big also. In some ways Whitman is less radical than Wordsworth in that the semantic and semiotic always coincide, by which we mean each line lasts as long as the idea so that the breaking of the line supports rather than challenges the semantic aims. Yet in abandoning syllabic-measure he allowed us to see and hear the line as a line thus opened up a whole new field of poetry for the century to follow.

The final 19thc poet to mention in this regard is, of course, Mallarmé. His masterwork, Un Coup de Dés presents us with a rhythmical interchange of lines that still seems fresh today. He practically wrote the book on line-measure. I am looking at the poem now, I never tire of looking at it. It is beautiful and exciting. I would like it on my wall. I would rather look it than many works by Mondrian or Kandinsky. It exploits the effects of the distribution of lines in space that are the essence of twentieth century art. Put it next to a Pollock and you begin to get the idea. Who cares if it is in French or English? I don't want to read it; I want to gaze at it.

In addition to fully revealing the rhymicality of interactions between serial strings of words and the space around them, the poem also shows what the breaking of a line does, what columns do, what typefaces do. In that work you understand the vertical field of moving from line to line, the horizontal field of moving from word to word, and the diagonal interchange of the two. Sometimes the poem moochs moodily at the left margin, other times it leaps to the right margin, then it undermines the idea of frames altogether finding internal margins that, visually, enact Derridean deconstructive ideas of margin and centre. A fact, I am sure, not lost on Derrida.

If one puts together these three poets one begins to understand the potential, the importance and also the challenge of line-measure. I will summarise some of these below in note form: -The tension between the semantic and the semiotic, the content of the poem and its distribution across breath, space and time, need not be resolved -When the idea overwhelms the line, the line can either run along with the idea or it can fight back with line-breaks -The look of the poem is now central to the rhythm of the poem, people see many more poems than they hear or read -The visual field of the poem is determined by the dimensions of the page just as in a painting, a photo or a film -All the dimensions of the page can be exploited in linear distributions in the midst of space for a wide variety of effects -The beginning, middle and end of a line are all important, as is the location of their occurrence -Yet the line also oversteps the page. The page is to the poem as the sentence is, in linguistics, to the phrase, an artificial and non-essential imposition which is, nevertheless, fascinating -Lines can be longer than the limits of the page vertically but not really horizontally -A line break occurs at the end of the line but not only there, they also break at the beginning and the middle sometimes -Space is as much part of the semiotic fabric of the poem as words and marks are, and this can produce definite, if limited, semantic effects.
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

John Ashbery, Some Trees

John Ashbery, Some Trees
(New York: Corinth Books, 1970)
Originally published (New York: 1956)

Close Readings and annotations of every poem in the collection March-April 1997 in preparation for In the Process of Poetry: The New York School and the Avant-Garde (Bucknell UP, 2001) currently in the process of complete update (2013)

"Two Scenes," 9

This is a poem about duality so in this sense the title actually refers to what the poem is ‘about’. John Shoptaw notes, for example, the phonic mirroring of the poem which he sees as an element later phased out as is the “linear introversion” to be found here. Thus we have the following phonic recurrences: “we see us as we”; “Destiny...destiny”; “News...noise”; “”; “-y” and rhymes of section 2; and “...old man/...paint cans”.

This simple but subtle semiotic device is then developed structurally as well, as the title hints. So ‘scene’ 2 reflects back internally onto ‘scene’ 1. “Machinery” recalls the train as does the canal; g…

John Ashbery, Self-Portrait in a Convex Mirror

John Ashbery, Self-Portrait in a Convex Mirror
(Manchester: Carcanet, 1977)
First Published (New York: Viking, 1975)

Close Readings and annotations of every poem in the collection March-April 1997 in preparation for In the Process of Poetry: The New York School and the Avant-Garde (Bucknell UP, 2001)


· Shoptaw notes that this return to poetry is dominated by images of waiting, that narrative (especially fairy-tale) returns, as do the musically based titles, there are no prose poems and no fixed forms such as sonnets of pantoums, most are free verse paragraphs, also bring forward a new American speech, more direct and inclusive.

“As One Put Drunk into a Packet-Boat”, 1-2

· Shoptaw notes this was the original title for the collection, marking a self-consciously Romantic return to poetry, recording the thoughts of “I” from afternoon to night, just outside a childhood country home. Has a pastoral crisis narrative in that a summer storm gathers but passes leaving the poet relieved i…

The Grenfell Tower Murders

The 72 victims of Grenfell Tower Fire were murdered, victims of the violence of neglect.  Here is the proof.
A year ago, a fire started on the fourth floor of Grenfell Tower, due to a faulty appliance.  The fire spread quickly up the side of the building because the tower had been refurbished in 2016.  Flammable cladding had been added to the exterior building as part of an £8 million refit which appears to have primarily made the tower more cosmetically pleasing.  The money was not spent on improving fire safety within the building, it would appear, a cause for concern for residents’ groups for years. The initial cladding that was to be used is not illegal in the UK but its use is restricted in other countries.  To save costs a cheaper version was eventually attached to the building, a more flammable version. 
Once the fire caught, residents were advised to stay in their flats.  In 99% of all cases this is the best advice, because flats are designed to be “fire resistant boxes” surr…